Programs
Majors
Minors
Nondegree
Current Schedule
The Department wishes to congratulate Dr. Duffy on her promotion to the status of Assistant Professor. Dr. Duffy has been teaching at Buffalo State for a decade, including five years as a visiting assistant professor; starting Fall 2019, she will be joining us on a tenure track line. Dr. Duffy's research interests include the philosophy of mind and cognitive science, epistemology, and eastern philosophy; she also teaches a very popular meaning of life class.
The Department wishes to congratulate Visiting Assistant Professor John Torrey. John successfully defended his Ph.D. dissertation this month. The Department is also happy to report that John will be joining us as an Assistant Professor in the Fall. John specializes in African-American Philosophy, Social and Political Philosophy, and Applied Ethics. Welcome and Congratulations!
Abstract: What, exactly, is a philosophy of life? Who needs it, and why? In this talk I answer these questions beginning with a story that happened 23 centuries ago, and which resulted in the articulation of one of the most influential philosophies of antiquity, Stoicism. That philosophy is experiencing a comeback in the 21st century, for the simple reasons that it resonates with fundamentals of the human condition, and that it works in practice. We will see how Stoicism can offer a compass to navigate life, to set priorities for what is important, to become better citizens of the world, and even to prepare ourselves for the most difficult test of our character: our own demise at the end of our life.
The Department is happy to welcome Tess Leonard as our new secretary. Ms. Leonard joined the staff at Buffalo State in 2017. Since then, she has worked for the Office of Undergraduate Admissions and as a supervisor in the campus mailroom. Ms. Leonard’s work experience also includes running literacy and summer programs for school aged children. She earned her B.A. in English from SUNY Buffalo State in 2013.
Abstract: It has been argued that members of oppressed groups break "feeling rules" when they express anger at injustice. For this reason philosopher Alison Jaggar and law professor Janine Young Kim refer to emotions such as anger as outlaw emotions and affective transgressions, respectively. But I think more can be said. I shall argue that rage at racial injustice not only breaks feeling rules but "racial rules"--- emotive, cognitive, and behavioral rules that enforce white superiority, entitlement, and respect. Such rule breaking threatens racial domination projects. This helps explain why some are resistant to and critical of rage--particularly the apt, motivational, and productive kinds--and why a person who has this rage is a resistant figure.
Abstract: Black Americans have made many arguments that racial injustices committed against them should be rectified. Two issues arise from these arguments - how should we understand what is it to rectify these injustices; and what can explain why these arguments have not been taken seriously in America? I argue two things. First, that rectificatory justice, a type of justice specifically designed to set unjust situations right, can explain what it is to rectify those injustices. Second, that how Black Americans are socially recognized affects their ability to receive rectificatory justice.
